What the dates mean
Original research cutoff: . This substantive revision checked selected primary records on . It corrects the earlier legal and tax summary and narrows claims the sources cannot sustain. It is not a complete September audit of every authorization, game program or tax circumstance.
The discussion separates a law, an administrative approval, a game's registration and actual availability. A document in one category cannot establish the others. The MINCETUR registers are the place to examine named records; individual questions require the current records and appropriately qualified Peruvian advice.
Peru at a glance
The framework applies nationally, but its authorizations attach to distinct activities, platforms and games. These rows summarize what was checked, rather than rating a service or a player's position.
On a narrow screen, scroll this table sideways. With a keyboard, focus the table and use the arrow keys.
| Question | Reference point | Limit |
|---|---|---|
| Original research cutoff | 29 April 2026 | The earlier market snapshot keeps its original date. It was not a finding about the position on every later day. |
| Bounded revision | 27 September 2026 | Selected official law, register, tax and enforcement records were checked. No individual service or account was tested. |
| Administrative authority | MINCETUR / DGJCMT | The ministry administers remote-gaming authorization and supervision; SUNAT administers the remote-games tax. |
| Operator permission | Separate activities and approvals | Remote games and remote sports betting require separate exploitation authorizations. Platforms and particular game programs have their own registration layer. |
| Poker classification | Check the named game | The law does not name poker. A poker-named register entry alone does not establish current peer-to-peer poker on a particular platform. |
| Tax distinction | Monthly exploitation tax and stake-based ISC | The 12% tax applies to an operator's calculated monthly base. ISC is 1% of each stake; the legal taxpayer depends on the operator's establishment. |
The law and the register are different evidence
Ley 31557, published 13 August 2022, established Peru's remote-games and remote-sports-betting framework. MINCETUR identifies Ley 31806 as its 28 June 2023 amendment and its DGJCMT directorate as the non-tax administrative authority. Decreto Supremo 005-2023-MINCETUR was published on 13 October 2023 to implement the law. Official accounts of the precise February 2024 start and application window differ, so this page does not assign a single day to them.
Three layers of approval
- Exploitation authorization: the law treats remote games and remote sports betting as separate activities. A Peru-established company, a local branch of a foreign company or a foreign company without a Peru branch may apply. The authorization is personal and renewable after six years. This describes eligibility to apply, not approval of any company. MINCETUR's procedure sets out the application categories.
- Platform authorization and registration: the law separately provides for technical certification and two-year renewable platform registration. The platform register answers a narrower question than the holder register.
- Named game authorization: article 12.3.1 permits stakes only on games authorized and registered with MINCETUR. The game-program and game-mode registers therefore matter; a sports-betting approval alone does not approve a remote poker product.
What a poker search showed. At the September 2026 check, the public program register returned poker-named entries ranging from Caribbean Stud and Casino Holdem to video-poker variants and a Texas Holdem Poker Spin entry. These are specific registered names, not a blanket classification for all forms of poker. The source does not pair those search results with a verified, currently available ordinary player-versus-player game on a named authorized platform. Read the separate public registers for any later question.
Two taxes with different bases and taxpayers
SUNAT's remote-games tax guidance describes a monthly tax on the exploitation of authorized remote games and sports betting. Operating legal entities are the taxpayers, including qualifying foreign companies. The 12% rate applies to a calculated base: gross monthly receipts include stakes and money-valued bonuses; prizes and refunds reduce monthly net income; an eligible excess can carry forward; and a deemed maintenance amount of 2% of that net income is deducted. The base is calculated separately by platform. It is therefore inaccurate to describe the tax simply as 12% of players' net winnings.
SUNAT separately explains the selective consumption tax (ISC) on the value of each stake, including money-valued bonuses. Decreto Supremo 008-2025-EF, published 19 January 2025, set 0.3% through June 2025 and 1% from 1 July 2025. For a Peru-established operator, SUNAT describes an operator liability. For games on an authorized foreign-company platform, it identifies the player as the legal ISC taxpayer and the foreign operator as the party collecting and remitting the amount. Neither tax is a flat percentage of a player's winnings.
These sources do not decide the separate income-tax treatment of a particular prize or live tournament result. A 15 February 2026 MINCETUR publication invited comments on a draft ISC technical directive; publication of a draft did not itself change the rate.
Enforcement: powers and a dated action
The law's articles 35–38 provide administrative measures for violations, including warnings, fines expressed as 1–200 tax units (UIT), cancellation or ineligibility, and corrective blocking of URLs, IP addresses or applications. Its separate blocking provision directs the communications authority to act on unauthorized offers at MINCETUR's request. The value of a UIT can change, so a fixed soles figure would misstate the statutory range.
In a 21 July 2026 announcement, MINCETUR said it had blocked 36 unauthorized remote-games or sports-betting platforms in coordination with the Ministry of Transport and Communications. This is a dated report of one enforcement action. It does not establish a percentage reduction in unlicensed activity, the full case record, or immunity for individual players.
A documented Lima tournament, kept in its year
The Latin American Poker Tour announced a Lima stop for June 2010 at Atlantic City Casino in Miraflores. In an April 2011 report from the following Lima event, its organizer recalled 384 entrants and a prize pool near USD 1 million for the 2010 main event. That is evidence of a historical live-poker scene, separate from the later remote-gaming law. It says nothing about the venue's present operation, contemporary tournament dates or online-game approval.
Research and safety resources
For a named platform or game, compare the present MINCETUR records with the actual activity. If the answer affects your circumstances, consult an appropriately qualified Peruvian professional.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Peru's remote-gaming law expressly authorize online poker?
Ley 31557 regulates remote games, but its text does not name poker. It requires games offered for stakes to be specifically authorized and registered with MINCETUR. The public program register contains some poker-named casino and video-game entries; that does not establish that ordinary peer-to-peer poker is currently offered on any particular authorized platform or that a reader may participate.
Are a registered company and a registered poker game enough to establish availability?
No. MINCETUR publishes separate holder, platform, program and game-mode registers. The relevant authorization, platform registration, named game and their present conditions must be read together. A historical entry or a broadly described remote-gaming category cannot establish a current operator-product pairing.
Is Peru's 12% remote-games tax a tax on a player's winnings?
No. The 12% remote-games exploitation tax is owed by operating legal entities. Its monthly base takes account of stakes and money-valued bonuses, prizes and refunds, eligible carryovers, and a statutory maintenance deduction equal to 2% of net monthly income. This statement does not decide any separate tax question about an individual's winnings.
How does the 1% selective consumption tax differ?
The ISC is calculated on the value of each remote-game or remote-sports-betting stake, including money-valued bonuses. The published rate became 1% on 1 July 2025. SUNAT distinguishes a Peru-established operator's liability from the foreign-operator case, in which the player is the legal ISC taxpayer and the authorized foreign operator collects and remits it. It is not a 1% levy on winnings.
What does the public enforcement record establish?
Ley 31557 provides administrative sanctions and blocking measures against unauthorized remote-gaming offers. MINCETUR reported that it blocked 36 unauthorized platforms in coordination with the transport and communications ministry on 21 July 2026. That dated report is not a complete case tally or an assurance about an individual's legal position.
Was there a live poker tournament in Lima?
Yes. The Latin American Poker Tour organizer announced its June 2010 Lima stop at Atlantic City Casino in Miraflores. Its April 2011 report retrospectively recorded 384 entrants and a prize pool near USD 1 million for that 2010 event. Those historical records do not establish today's room schedule, venue status or entry conditions.
Primary sources and remaining limits
Selected records were checked on 27 September 2026. Their publication dates and purposes differ. A law states the framework; a public register lists records; SUNAT explains particular taxes; an enforcement notice reports an action. None alone establishes a current peer-to-peer poker offering, an individual's position or complete tax treatment. The original research cutoff remains 29 April 2026.
- Congress consolidated Ley 31557 (PDF); MINCETUR's DS 005-2023-MINCETUR; exploitation-authorization procedure — law, implementing regulation and application scope.
- MINCETUR public register index, including separate holder, platform, game-program and game-mode records — dynamic entries requiring a dated check.
- SUNAT remote-games exploitation tax; SUNAT ISC guidance; the published ISC rate decree — separate taxable bases and collection rules.
- MINCETUR's 21 July 2026 blocking announcement — one reported enforcement action.
- LAPT's 2010 Lima announcement and 2011 first-hand report — historical live tournament evidence.
Material corrections here include Ley 31806's publication date, the separate approval layers, the monthly tax formula and the ISC's foreign-operator taxpayer distinction. The precise February 2024 commencement/window remains unresolved in the official materials reviewed. No current operator-product pairing or broad absence-of-prosecution finding is certified.
Related country research
Each country guide has its own sources and dates; one jurisdiction's rules do not transfer to another.